Abstract
                                                                        This study aims to analyze the dynamics of the published articles and preprints of  Covid-19 related literature from different scientific databases and sharing platforms. The  PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ResearchGate (RG) databases were under consideration in  this study over a specific time. Analyses were carried out on the number of publications  as (a) function of time (day), (b) journals and (c) authors. Doubling time of the number  of publications was analyzed for PubMed “all articles” and ScienceDirect published  articles. Analyzed databases were (1A) PubMed (01/12/2019-12/06/2020) “all_articles”  (1B) PubMed Review articles) and (1C) PubMed Clinical Trials (2) ScienceDirect all  publications (01/12/2019- 25/05/2020) (3) RG  (Article, Pre Print, Technical Report)  (15/04/2020 – 30/4/2020). Total publications in the observation period for PubMed,  ScienceDirect, and RG were 23000, 5898 and 5393 respectively. The average number of  publications/day for PubMed, ScienceDirect and RG were 70.0 ±128.6, 77.6±125.3 and  255.6±205.8 respectively. PubMed shows an avalanche in the number of publications  around May 10, the number of publications jumped from 6.0±8.4/day to 282.5±110.3/  day. The average doubling time for PubMed, ScienceDirect, and RG was 10.3±4 days,  20.6 days, and 2.3±2.0 days respectively. The average number of publications per author  for PubMed, ScienceDirect, and RG was 1.2±1.4, 1.3±0.9, and 1.1±0.4 respectively.  Subgroup analysis, PubMed review articles mean review <0|17±17|77> days; and  reducing at a rate of -0.21 days (count)/day. The number of publications related to the  COVID-19 until now is huge and growing very fast with time. It is essential to rationalize  and limit the publications.