Abstract
                                                                        Online social media platforms have evolved into a significant place  for debate around socio-political phenomena such as government  policies and bills. Studying online debates on such topics can help  infer people’s perception and acceptance of the happenings. At the  same time, various inauthentic users that often pollute the democratic discussion of the subject need to be weeded out from the  debate. The characterization of a campaign keeping in mind various  forms of involved actors thus becomes very important. On December 12, 2019, Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) was enacted by  the Indian Government, triggering a debate on whether the act was  unfair. In this work, we investigate the user’s perception of the  #CitizenshipAmendmentAct on Twitter, as the campaign unrolled  with divergent discourse in the country. Keeping the campaign  participants as the prime focus, we study 9,947,814 tweets produced  by 275,111 users during the starting 3 months of protest. Our study  includes the analysis of user engagement, content, and network  properties with online accounts divided into authentic (genuine  users) and inauthentic (bots, suspended, and deleted) users. Our  findings show different themes in shared tweets among protesters  and counter-protesters. We find presence of inauthentic users on  both side of discourse, with counter-protesters having more inauthentic users than protesters. The follow network of the users  suggests homophily among users on the same side of discourse  and connection between various inauthentic and authentic users.  This work contributes to filling the gap of understanding the role  of users (from both sides) in a less studied geo-location, India.