Abstract
Around the world, there are a lot of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings situated in seismically active areas. Additionally, the majority of these buildings were not built in accordance with seismic code requirements. Buildings made of URM are seismically unsafe and require strengthening, as demonstrated by previous earthquakes. Masonry material exhibits a great deal of variability in its behaviour, and the tensile or flexural capacity of the structural components is one of the key factors in the seismic susceptibility of masonry buildings. The flexural strength and deformability of URM walls can be increased using a variety of retrofitting methods. These can be loosely divided into two categories: “conventional” and “advanced”. The surface treatments (e.g., shotcrete, reinforced plaster, ferrocement overlays, polyurea spray technology), stitching and grout or epoxy injections, re-pointing, reinforced concrete confinement, and post-tensioning fall under the first category. The second category includes the use of seismic wallpaper (i.e., fiber-reinforced polymers—FRP such as epoxy-bonded strips or in situ impregnated fabrics), textile-reinforced mortar composites (mesh/fabric reinforcement in the form of fibre, wire, polypropylene bands, plastic bags, bamboo, etc.), and centre core. The present study reviews the state-of-the-art literature on several methods for reinforcing URM walls subject to lateral earthquake loading. The paper provides a complete overview of retrofitting techniques, including benefits, suitability, applicability, drawbacks, restrictions, sustainability, and consequences on rural communities. In addition, the effectiveness of retrofitting methods is compared using factors including weight, technology (i.e., level of skill required), cost, manpower, and disruption to occupants. The study’s findings will help the policymakers, archaeological survey of India (ASI), various government departments owning low-rise masonry buildings, planners, building owners, architects, structural engineers, consultants, and designers, select an appropriate retrofitting system. Further, the design methodology for retrofitting masonry walls using advanced composites like TRM and FRP is also described in detail, using an explanatory example for seismic in-plane and out-of-plane actions.