Abstract
Protonation and deprotonation of RNA bases, although energetically unfavorable, are known to play a key role in stabilization of the global structure of the RNA molecules and in regulating their functionalities. In this study an attempt has been made to look at the gas phase energies of the individual protonated and deprotonated bases, and the accompanying changes in their respective geometries and charge distribution. . Geometry optimization and energy calculations were carried out using QM methods at different levels of theory and approximations (B3LYP/6-31G++(2d,2p) and MP2/aug-ccpvdz). As expected, free energy calculations show that protonation/deprotonation at any possible site of a RNA base as a disfavored process characterized by a positive free energy change. It is however important to note that protonation at any exocyclic site or at ring imino nitrogen sites, and deprotonation from any site lead to planar and stable geometry of the corresponding conjugate acids and bases respectively. Protonation of secondary amino nitrogen atoms in the ring, such as N1of G or N3 of U, on the other hand, give significantly deformed structures where covalent bonds are also broken. Comparison of the geometrical parameters and Mulliken charge distribution in the neutral bases, with those of the corresponding charged species, showed interesting variations depending on the identity of the bases as well as on their respective protonation/deprotonation sites. It has been found that protonation at imino nitrogen atoms are not only energetically less costly, geometrical changes and charge redistribution that take place in the protonated species also help the protonated base to take part in non-covalent interactions like hydrogen bonding. Protonation at N7 position of Guanine is found to be most favorable among all possible protonation sites in any RNA base. Similar free energy calculation for nucleosides also showed the same trend and N7 protonation of Guanosine comes out to be the energetically least costly process. When we examined experimentally detected protonated base pairs involving N7 of guanine, and carried out geometry optimization for the two protonation possibilities, it was remarkable to note that it was the partner base-protonated configuration which turned out to be more stable. In fact, geometry optimization of the configuration, containing N7-protonated Guanine, resulted in the transfer of proton from N7 of Guanine to the nearest electronegative atom of the partner base. This may be because of enhanced hydrogen bonding in the alternate configuration. The next best possible protonation site among the nucleic acid bases is N3 of Cytosine, which also has many other biochemical roles. N7 protonation of Guanine, however, leads to variation of several theoretically calculated IR frequencies, some of which may destabilize the glycosidic bond. As the protonated bases are quite stable, they may play greater role in base pairing interactions in RNA.