Abstract

Evaluating tables qualitatively and quantitatively poses a significant challenge, as standard metrics often overlook subtle structural and content-level discrepancies. To address this, we propose a rubric-based evaluation framework that integrates multi-level structural descriptors with fine-grained contextual signals, enabling more precise and consistent table comparison. Building on this, we introduce TabXEval, an eXhaustive and eXplainable two-phase evaluation framework. TabXEval first aligns reference and predicted tables structurally via TabAlign, then performs semantic and syntactic comparison using TabCompare, offering interpretable and granular feedback. We evaluate TabXEval on TabXBench, a diverse, multi-domain benchmark featuring realistic table perturbations and human annotations. A sensitivity-specificity analysis further demonstrates the robustness and explainability of TabXEval across varied table tasks. Code and data are available at https://coral-lab-asu.github.io/tabxeval/.

Abstract

People worldwide use language in subtle and complex ways to express emotions. Although emotion recognition--an umbrella term for several NLP tasks--impacts various applications within NLP and beyond, most work in this area has focused on high-resource languages. This has led to significant disparities in research efforts and proposed solutions, particularly for under-resourced languages, which often lack high-quality annotated datasets. In this paper, we present BRIGHTER--a collection of multilabeled, emotion-annotated datasets in 28 different languages and across several domains. BRIGHTER primarily covers low-resource languages from Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, and Latin America, with instances labeled by fluent speakers. We highlight the challenges related to the data collection and annotation processes, and then report experimental results for monolingual and crosslingual multi-label emotion identification, as well as emotion intensity recognition. We analyse the variability in performance across languages and text domains, both with and without the use of LLMs, and show that the BRIGHTER datasets represent a meaningful step towards addressing the gap in text-based emotion recognition.

Abstract

Machine Translation (MT) revolutionizes cross-lingual communication but is prone to errors, necessitating thorough evaluation for enhancement. Translation quality can be assessed by humans and automatic evaluation metrics. Human evaluation, though valuable, is costly and subject to limitations in scalability and consistency. While automated metrics supplement manual evaluations, this field still has considerable potential for development. However, there exists prior survey work on automatic evaluation metrics, it is worth noting that most of these are focused on resource-rich languages, leaving a significant gap in evaluating MT outputs across other language families. To bridge this gap, we present an exhaustive survey, encompassing discussions on MT meta-evaluation datasets, human assessments, and diverse metrics. We categorize both human and automatic evaluation approaches, and offer decision trees to aid in selecting the appropriate approach. Additionally, we evaluate sentences across languages, domains and linguistic features, and further meta-evaluate the metrics by correlating them with human scores. We critically examine the limitations and challenges inherent in current datasets and evaluation approaches. We propose suggestions for future research aimed at enhancing MT evaluation, including the importance of diverse and well-distributed datasets, the refinement of human evaluation methodologies, and the development of robust metrics that closely align with human judgments.

Abstract

Current computational approaches for analysing or generating code-mixed sentences do not explicitly model ``naturalness'' or ``acceptability'' of code-mixed sentences, but rely on training corpora to reflect distribution of acceptable code-mixed sentences. Modelling human judgement for the acceptability of code-mixed text can help in distinguishing natural code-mixed text and enable quality-controlled generation of code-mixed text. To this end, we construct Cline - a dataset containing human acceptability judgements for English-Hindi~(en-hi) code-mixed text. Cline is the largest of its kind with 16,642 sentences, consisting of samples sourced from two sources: synthetically generated code-mixed text and samples collected from online social media. Our analysis establishes that popular code-mixing metrics such as CMI, Number of Switch Points, Burstines, which are used to filter/curate/compare code-mixed corpora have low correlation with human acceptability judgements, underlining the necessity of our dataset. Experiments using Cline demonstrate that simple Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) models when trained solely using code-mixing metrics as features are outperformed by fine-tuned pre-trained Multilingual Large Language Models (MLLMs). Specifically, among Encoder models XLM-Roberta and Bernice outperform IndicBERT across different configurations. Among Encoder-Decoder models, mBART performs better than mT5, however Encoder-Decoder models are not able to outperform Encoder-only models. Decoder-only models perform the best when compared to all other MLLMS, with Llama 3.2 - 3B models outperforming similarly sized Qwen, Phi models. Comparison with zero and fewshot capabilitites of ChatGPT show that MLLMs fine-tuned on larger data outperform ChatGPT, providing scope for improvement in code-mixed tasks. Zero-shot transfer from En-Hi to En-Te acceptability judgments are better than random baselines.

Abstract

Puns, as a linguistic phenomenon, hold significant importance in both humor and language comprehension. While extensive research has been conducted in the realm of pun generation in English, there exists a notable gap in the exploration of pun generation within code-mixed text, particularly in Hindi-English code-mixed text. This study addresses this gap by offering a computational method specifically designed to create puns in Hindi-English code-mixed text. In our investigation, we delve into three distinct methodologies aimed at pun generation utilizing pun-alternate word pairs. Furthermore, this novel dataset, HECoP, comprising of 2000 human-annotated sentences serves as a foundational resource for training diverse pun detection models. Additionally, we developed a structured pun generation pipeline capable of generating puns from a single input word without relying on predefined word pairs. Through rigorous human evaluations, our study demonstrates the efficacy of our proposed models in generating code-mixed puns. The findings presented herein lay a solid groundwork for future endeavours in pun generation and computational humor within diverse linguistic contexts.

Abstract

Vision-language models (VLMs) excel at tasks requiring joint understanding of visual and linguistic information. A particularly promising yet under-explored application for these models lies in answering questions based on various kinds of maps. This study investigates the efficacy of VLMs in answering questions based on choropleth maps, which are widely used for data analysis and representation. To facilitate and encourage research in this area, we introduce a novel map-based question-answering benchmark, consisting of maps from three geographical regions (United States, India, China), each containing around 1000 questions. Our benchmark incorporates 43 diverse question templates, requiring nuanced understanding of relative spatial relationships, intricate map features, and complex reasoning. It also includes maps with discrete and continuous values, covering variations in color mapping, category ordering, and stylistic patterns, enabling a comprehensive analysis. We evaluated the performance of multiple VLMs on this benchmark, highlighting gaps in their abilities, and providing insights for improving such models. Our dataset, along with all necessary code scripts, is available at map-wise.github.io

Abstract

Autoencoders have been used for finding inter- pretable and disentangled features underlying neural network representations in both image and text domains. While the efficacy and pitfalls of such methods are well-studied in vision, there is a lack of corresponding results, both qualitative and quantitative, for the text domain. We aim to address this gap by training sparse autoencoders (SAEs) on a synthetic testbed of formal languages. Specifically, we train SAEs on the hidden representations of models trained on formal languages (Dyck-2, Expr, and English PCFG) under a wide variety of hyperparameter settings, finding interpretable latents often emerge in the features learned by our SAEs. However, similar to vision, we find performance turns out to be highly sensitive to inductive biases of the training pipeline. Moreover, we show latents correlating to certain features of the input do not always induce a causal impact on model’s computation. We thus ar- gue that causality has to become a central tar- get in SAE training: learning of causal features should be incentivized from the ground- up. Motivated by this, we propose and perform preliminary investigations for an approach that promotes learning of causally relevant features in our formal language setting.

Abstract

Transformer-based language models, though not explicitly trained to mimic brain recordings, have demonstrated surprising alignment with brain activity. Progress in these models—through increased size, instruction-tuning, and multimodality—has led to better representational alignment with neural data. Recently, a new class of instruction-tuned multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) have emerged, showing remarkable zero-shot capabilities in open-ended multimodal vision tasks. However, it is unknown whether MLLMs, when prompted with natural instructions, lead to better brain alignment and effectively capture instruction-specific representations. To address this, we first investigate the brain alignment, i.e., measuring the degree of predictivity of neural visual activity using text output response embeddings from MLLMs as participants engage in watching natural scenes. Experiments with 10 different instructions (like image captioning, visual question answering, etc.) show that MLLMs exhibit significantly better brain alignment than vision-only models and perform comparably to non-instruction-tuned multimodal models like CLIP. We also find that while these MLLMs are effective at generating high-quality responses suitable to the task-specific instructions, not all instructions are relevant for brain alignment. Further, by varying instructions, we make the MLLMs encode instruction-specific visual concepts related to the input image. This analysis shows that MLLMs effectively capture count-related and recognition-related concepts, demonstrating strong alignment with brain activity. Notably, the majority of the explained variance of the brain encoding models is shared between MLLM embeddings of image captioning and other instructions. These results indicate that enhancing MLLMs' ability to capture more task-specific information could allow for better differentiation between various types of instructions, and hence improve their precision in predicting brain responses.

Abstract

Evaluating machine translation (MT) systems for low-resource languages has long been a challenge due to the limited availability of evaluation metrics and resources. As a result, researchers in this space have relied primarily on lexical-based metrics like BLEU, TER, and ChrF, which lack semantic evaluation. In this first-of-its-kind work, we propose a novel pivot-based evaluation framework that addresses these limitations; after translating low-resource language outputs into a related high-resource language, we leverage advanced neural and embedding-based metrics for more meaningful evaluation. Through a series of experiments using five low-resource languages: Assamese, Manipuri, Kannada, Bhojpuri, and Nepali, we demonstrate how this method extends the coverage of both lexical-based and embedding-based metrics, even for languages not directly supported by advanced metrics. Our results show that the differences between direct and pivot-based evaluation scores are minimal, proving that this approach is a viable and effective solution for evaluating translations in endangered and low-resource languages. This work paves the way for more inclusive, accurate, and scalable MT evaluation for underrepresented languages, marking a significant step forward in this under-explored area of research.

Abstract

This paper presents an evaluation of 16 machine translation systems submitted to the Shared Task of the 9th Conference of Machine Translation (WMT24) for the English-Hindi (en-hi) language pair using our Complex Structures Test (CoST) suite. Aligning with this year’s test suite sub-task theme, “Help us break LLMs”, we curated a comprehensive test suite encompassing diverse datasets across various categories, including autobiography, poetry, legal, conversation, play, narration, technical, and mixed genres. Our evaluation reveals that all the systems struggle significantly with the archaic style of text like legal and technical writings or text with creative twist like conversation and poetry datasets, highlighting their weaknesses in handling complex linguistic structures and stylistic nuances inherent in these text types. Our evaluation identifies the strengths and limitations of the submitted models, pointing to specific areas where further research and development are needed to enhance their performance. Our test suite is available at https://github.com/AnanyaCoder/CoST-WMT-24-Test-Suite-Task.