Abstract
Urbanization is rapidly increasing in almost every city in India. Huge infrastructure developmental plans have been laid by the government and private organizations. Large advertising boards of tall buildings (ranging from 30 to 50 floors) already started attracting people to invest in these infrastructure plans. However, from the point of view of seismic hazard prevailing in the country,“Will these buildings survive during future earthquakes?” is a question to be answered before proceeding for construction. In last 2.5 decades, 7 moderate earthquakes have been witnessed: Bihar-Nepal border (M6. 4) in 1988, Uttarkashi (M6. 6) in 1991, Killari (M6. 3) in 1993, Jabalpur (M6. 0) in 1997, Chamoli (M6. 8) in 1999, Bhuj (M6. 9) in 2001, A&N Islands (M9. 3) in 2004, Muzaffarabad (M7. 2) in 2005, Sikkim (M6. 8) in 2011 and more recently Twin Earthquakes in the neighborhood Nepal. These earthquakes have clearly exposed the lack of understanding of seismic hazard of the country. Sometimes, even when the hazard is understood, the lack of knowledge is exposed on earthquake resistant design and construction practice of reinforced concrete structures. The professionals involved in building construction should be more concerned with the safety of building infrastructure during future earthquake events. Among several aspects, natural period of building is one of the crucial parameters which decide the seismic demand of the building. Present study focuses on developing an empirical expression of fundamental natural period of RC tall buildings in India with the help of ambient vibration tests. Through the study it is found that the periodheight relationship is …