Abstract

Across the globe, stone has been extensively used as a building construction material due to its local availability and high durability. The scenario for the construction of buildings in India is no more different than compared to other parts of the world. According to the 2011 Census of India, 43.48 million houses (~ 14% of the total number of houses) have stone as the predominant wall material. Owing to the fact of non-engineered construction, wide variations in terms of stone masonry construction can be seen in the Indian subcontinent, particularly in the Himalayan belt. In this study, a field survey is conducted to identify the seismic resistant features in traditional building practices which make use of stone for construction, e.g. Thathara construction, Dry stack construction, Koti Banal construction, etc. The percentage of these types of structures is decreasing due to an increase in urbanization, increasing housing demands, non-availability of traditional construction materials and skilled artesian for building new structures as well as costly repair and retrofitting techniques for damaged and existing structures. Thus, there is a dire need to safeguard these structures as if this trend continues, these buildings will become things of the past. In this paper, a review of structural configuration, roofing systems, foundation type and potential failure modes of these construction typologies are studied, and the effect of different retrofitting techniques that exist in the construction type on their expected seismic performance is discussed.

Abstract

The paper presents a seismic safety assessment of unreinforced masonry (URM) building using two approaches. The first approach uses the ‘Pier Analysis’ method, based on the concept of equivalent lateral stiffness, where in-plane and out-of-plane actions are considered independently. The second approach is developed with the program SAP2000, where the linear response is evaluated using continuum ‘finite element modelling’ (FEM). Both methods are compared to evaluate the safety of wall piers and the differences in the outcomes under combined gravitational and lateral seismic forces. The analysis results showed that few wall elements are unsafe in in-plane and out-of-plane tension. It is also observed that the pier analysis method is conservative compared to FEM, but can be used as a simplified and quick tool in design offices for safety assessment, with reasonable accuracy. To safeguard the URM wall piers under lateral loads, a retrofitting technique is adopted by providing vertical and horizontal belts called splints and bandages, respectively, using welded wire mesh (WWM) reinforcement. The study using the ‘Pier Analysis’ shows that the lateral load capacity of unsafe URM piers can be enhanced up to 3.67 times and made safe using the applied retrofitting technique. Further, the retrofitting design methodology and recommendations for application procedures to on-site URM buildings are discussed in detail.

Abstract

Estimation of basic material properties of masonry and understanding its compressive behaviour is the initial crucial steps in analyzing the performance of masonry buildings. Masonry being a complex and inelastic material has a large variation in mechanical properties such as compressive strength and modulus of elasticity. The variation for Indian masonry is even higher, as most of the manufacturing and construction process is performed manually. Mechanical characterization of solid clay bricks, mortar cubes (1:4 cement-sand proportion) and masonry prisms are performed using laboratory tests to determine the compressive properties. The non-linear stress strain behaviour of masonry and its constituents is also presented. Based on the results of the present study and past literature, variation in mechanical properties of Indian masonry & its constituents is studied based on two different mortar grades (1:4 and 1:6). It is observed that these properties have a large portion of aleatory variability, due to variations in constituent materials and workmanship. The relationship between the compressive strength and elastic modulus of brick, mortar and masonry is also presented. Further, the relative performance of different empirical models in predicting the properties of masonry is compared and their efficacy is examined using the statistical and error-assessment parameters. Results showed that the compressive strength of the Indian masonry can be determined using most of the empirical relations available worldwide, with reasonable accuracy; however, the elastic modulus of masonry cannot be estimated with the same level of confidence.