Abstract
Theoretical insights into homo versus heterochiral cyclic trimerization of 5-(aminoethyl)-2-furancarboxylic acid (AEFC) are provided based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations[1]. A comparison of pathways leading to cyclic trimerization explored at M06/6-31G(d,p) and B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) levels of theory indicates signicance of the M06 functional in determining the barrier heights. Kinetic preference for heterochiral cyclization is clearly observed from results obtained at M06/6-31G(d,p) level of theory. Structure analysis of geometries reveals existence of strong hydrogen bonding interactions in the solvated heterochiral tripeptides. Further support comes from IR spectra, NBO and AIM calculations, molecular electrostatic potential and electron density surfaces. Our study shows that for the kind of systems, calculations with solvent molecules, even if a few only, are sucient to substantiate experimental observations. Further study on anion binding anity of the peptides has revealed that while both homo and heterochiral cyclic tripeptides show equal electronic energies of interaction for a uoride ion in gas phase, the homochiral cyclic tripeptide shows relatively larger electronic energy of interaction for chloride and bromide ions ( 4 kcal/mol) compared to that shown by heterochiral cyclic tripeptide. In solvent phase, the peptides possess anity for uoride and chloride ions only. While, heterochiral cyclic peptide shows slightly larger interaction for uoride ion, anity of homochiral peptide for chloride ion is slightly larger than its heterochiral counterpart. Though the heterochiral cyclic tripeptide of AEFC is a stable product with high yield, anion recognition propensities are comparable to that of homochiral cyclic tripeptide.