Abstract
Forensic document verification presents a different and interesting set of challenges as opposed to traditional writer identification and verification tasks using natural handwriting. The handwritten data presented to a forensic examiner is often deliberately altered, in addition to being limited in quantity. Specifically, the alterations can be either forged, where one imitates another person’s handwriting; or repudiated, where one deliberately distorts his handwriting in order to avoid identification. In this paper, we present a framework to detect repudiation in forensic documents, where we only have one pair of documents to arrive at a decision. The approach generates a statistically significant confidence score from matching two documents, which can be used to screen the documents that are passed on to an expert examiner. The approach can be extended for detection of forgeries as well.